[Misfitbite] Guilty Pleasure - Baiken and Bridget

Art man is probably the biggest rapper I've seen in my life

Bruh, Bridget literally says "I'm a girl" in-game, tf are these people smoking?

I would love to do a threesome with those 2 hot girls

Anyway, there will be some mistakes here, but out of momentary laziness I won’t correct them. It’s just a small summary, and no, this text was written in 30 minutes.


Before anyone reads my text — if they actually bother to read it — let me make one thing clear: I’m not some Twitter activist or anything like that. Even though I’m an atheist, I’m a fairly chatty guy; I just wanted to clarify that upfront.

Let’s go step by step:

First topic: What can or cannot be considered/classified as futa?

Futa is an old concept that predates any modern hentai narrative, and its definition is simple: an individual possessing both reproductive organs. So no — just because a character has breasts and a penis does not automatically make them futa. In fact, that contradicts the original concept, and that’s the problem.

Since most of the audience consuming trans content is composed of men — roughly 80% of consumers are men, and 90% of clients in prostitution are men as well — the same applies to futanari. Men have always been the main creators and consumers of futa, and they still are, especially as consumers. The issue is that men often feel “less masculine” when consuming gay content, so they classify anything with a feminine appearance, breasts, and a penis as futa (short for futanari).

And here lies the contradiction: if everything is futa, then nothing is futa. In the end, they’re just masturbating to women/trans/travestis without realizing it, deliberately trying to escape labels. Yet they contradict themselves by labeling everything convenient as futa just to feel “less gay.”

Topic: Is the LGBTQ+ community “stealing” the futa “genre”?

Of course, there’s also the controversy of the LGBTQ+ community being accused of “stealing” the futa concept, as if they want trans women to also be called futanari. But I have my own view on this confusion.

Since tags like transfem, trans, or trans woman are not very popular, some people unfortunately tag trans characters as futanari just to gain visibility (views). This is then perceived as an attempt to “steal” the concept. For context: the tag shemale is well known on some sites, but others avoid labeling trans women with it because of the term’s historically negative use and the hate it attracts. (But in practice, it refers to the same thing.)

Topic: So what about female characters who suddenly have a penis but no vagina?

Simple: if an already established female character (from an existing work) suddenly appears with a penis but no vagina, the more accurate term would be dickgirl. However, if the character is an OC (original character) and was born with both breasts and a penis, then, biologically and conceptually, she is trans/shemale (same thing, just different words).

Topic: Labels.

At the end of the day, those who label everything as futa while criticizing the LGBTQ+ community and its discourse on heteronormativity or Christianity are being hypocrites, since from the very beginning of pornography, the West has been teaching us that everything (even men, lol) can be futanari.

Topic: “Trying to put logic into futanari.”

I’m not questioning whether futanari makes sense or not — because let’s be honest, it doesn’t. My point is that from its very inception, futanari has always been consistent: it refers to characters possessing both sexual organs (usually a small-to-medium penis, often without testicles).

This idea predates even classic hentai illustrations and was a defining feature in early representations of futanari in hentai art.

By definition, futanari (二成り) in Japanese refers to characters who simultaneously possess male and female sexual characteristics, based on the concept of hermaphroditism. Multiple Japanese sources, including cultural and linguistic studies, confirm that futanari involves simultaneously having both penis and vagina — not simply replacing one with the other [[Kinsella, Adult Manga: Culture and Power in Contemporary Japanese Society, 2000]; [Galbraith, Otaku and the Struggle for Imagination in Japan, 2019]].

Topic: Existing characters being labeled as futanari.

See how Western pornography is frying people’s brains? Some idiots are calling characters like V (Cyberpunk 2077), Orela Rose, Poison, Brooklyn, Sallie May, Vivian, Bridget, Catalyst, Nocturne, Claire Russell, Erica Anderson, Marina, Nia Nal, Selma Reesedale futanari, even though in the original work — and even in hentai versions where the futa tag was added — they do not have vaginas.

But here’s the issue: futa/futanari originates from the Eastern hermaphroditism concept, which existed long before hentai was ever created. And the definition is straightforward: possessing both reproductive organs. So why is it so hard to understand that if a female character doesn’t use magic to grow a penis, doesn’t undergo surgery to remove the vagina, doesn’t eliminate one organ in favor of the other, or isn’t portrayed by the artist with both penis and vagina, then that character should automatically be classified as trans/travesti? It’s such a simple concept.

Topic: Understanding.

I get it when people use the futa tag just to gain visibility — since the trans tag still isn’t that popular. But when someone actually believes that a character who clearly has all the characteristics of a trans/travesti is “futa,” and not just tagged that way for views, that’s absurd — a tremendous intellectual ignorance.

As a side note: the customizable character V in Cyberpunk 2077 has only three official genital options:

1. Male


2. Female


3. Neutral



Both organs simultaneously exist only through mods, not officially. And we know that in 92% of published content, V does not possess both penis and vagina at the same time. There’s no official option for both organs, because if there were, it would fit into the hermaphrodite/futanari category.

Topic: Historical representations of futanari.

In mythology and ancient art, depictions often showed modest or ambiguous genitalia, emphasizing duality rather than hypermasculine traits. In hentai, the earliest futanari works followed this traditional concept, portraying characters with both a vagina and a small-to-medium penis.

The notion of futanari with large or oversized penises is a modern development, introduced in the 1980s.

Ironically, while male hentai characters have long been depicted with oversized or exaggerated penises — dating back 2,000 to 4,000 years in hypermasculine art and sculpture — futanari characters, even after the 1980s reinterpretation, generally remained in passive roles.

Futanari exists as a variation of the hermaphrodite concept from mythology, long before pornography. The moment you claim a character is futanari without a vagina, you create contradictions on multiple levels: cultural, historical, conceptual, biological, and logical.

If a character hasn’t used magic or surgery to remove the vagina, then they are simply a man. A man with genetic variations, strong intersex traits, or hormonal imbalances — since men can naturally develop breasts for various reasons and even lactate. Biologically, all humans have some mammary tissue, but in men it is typically minimal. However, conditions such as gynecomastia (caused by hormonal imbalance, medication, or disease) can enlarge male breasts. In rare cases, men may also lactate due to high prolactin levels.

Topic: On the use of “shemale.”

You might say: “Wow! You used the term shemale to describe trans women!” Am I wrong? The term was originally created specifically to describe trans women or men with feminine secondary traits.

Given that we’re in a pornographic context, I don’t see a problem associating shemale with trans women. Furthermore, there’s still open debate on whether the term was sexualized from its very inception.

And honestly, the fact that some people get more upset about my supposedly outdated use of shemale but don’t bat an eye at characters like otokonoko, tomgirl, shemale, femboy, ladyboy, sissy, newhalf, crossdressers, transfem being mislabeled as futa without even having vaginas… that’s extremely worrying, and you should reevaluate your principles.

Topic: Concern.

Look, I know my comment may sound silly, but this is something that’s really happening. I’m not proud of it, but I consume a lot of pornography, and I’ve noticed a trend — especially in the West — that’s distorting the concept of futanari.

For example, many works now classify female individuals without vaginas as futanari, and this is dangerous. Even in real porn videos they’re doing this!

I played a game with a trans protagonist who had a rich, complex story full of lore. Guess what the sites did? They tagged her as futanari. Same thing on Rule34.

See the problem? Think about it: if this continues, the only difference between “futanari” and a man will be the presence of breasts.

The West is altering the origin of the futanari concept, trying to force characters into the category even without a vagina. This not only goes against the definition but is also contradictory — since the only people with those traits (full penis, testicles, no vagina) are cis men.

I deliberately avoided talking about functionality because that would be unfair and distract from the debate. (This, of course, applies only to futanari supposedly born that way, without magic or similar interventions.)

You might ask: “But what about femininity?”
Simple: in 2025, it’s very common for men and male characters to look feminine. So using femininity alone as the criterion doesn’t work — people would quickly catch on, and the idea would lose traction.

But men with breasts? That’s less common, and that’s exactly where the danger lies. They will exploit this “rarity” to distort the meaning of futanari and trans, claiming that anyone with breasts is futa!

Someone could argue: “Okay, but to be futanari the character must have both breasts and femininity, combined.” Fair enough — but that’s exactly why I say femininity alone isn’t enough to justify the label.

Even in that scenario, the logic doesn’t change: 90–94% of trans girls, transfem, shemales, and hormonally altered male characters have both breasts and femininity. Not to mention the huge number of otokonoko, tomgirls, sissies, femboys, crossdressers, and ladyboys who also fit that description.

In other words, all these groups will end up being affected.

As an aside: futanari is not exclusively for predominantly feminine phenotypes. In fact, even on Pixiv, Japanese artists create futanari-men. What defines futanari is what’s between the legs, not the appearance.

Topic: The consequence — people believing in false tags.

And it’s already happening! Just look at how sites and users apply tags.

Transfem characters with breasts are being labeled futanari. Worse yet, some people are so absurd that they justify tagging trans characters as futanari simply because, in that hentai version, they have larger breasts — even without vaginas.

Example:

Original version — small breasts = trans

Hentai version with larger breasts (still no vagina) = futanari

See the problem? They take something as common as exaggerating breast size in an illustration and use it as an excuse to call the character futa — even if she already had breasts, just smaller!

Oftentimes it’s not the site admins but individual artists. It’s very common for artists to exaggerate traits: enlarging male characters’ penises (even if small in the original), enlarging women’s breasts, altering height, looks, personality, voice, etc.

But some people exploit this exaggeration and slap the futa tag on a trans/shemale character just because an artist drew her with bigger breasts.

Seriously, if this continues, soon even a 1 cm increase in breast size in trans/shemale women or men will be enough to label them futa.

Can you see how problematic this is?

Topic: Hypocrisy.

At the end of the day, those who label everything as futa while criticizing the LGBTQ+ community and its discourse on heteronormativity or Christianity are hypocrites, since from the beginning of pornography the West has been teaching us that everything (even men, lol) can be futa.

The LGBTQ+ community is also hypocritical: they speak so much about systems, Christianity, heteronormativity, beauty standards, oppression… yet they don’t realize they’re blindly following the same path they criticize.

They believe, consume, watch, and produce content labeled futa — which isn’t futa at all. See the paradox?

Topic: Am I transphobic?

So relax, young grasshopper — it’s not that I hate trans women. On the contrary, I actually find the concept fascinating and extremely interesting.

That’s why, in terms of hierarchy, I’d classify it like this:

Trans women >> intersex >> futanari

But who would win: futa women or cis women?
Honestly, I believe in most scenarios, cis women would win. So another version of the hierarchy would be:

Cis women >>> futanari

And in the worst-case scenario, it’d be something like:

Trans women >> intersex >> futanari >> cis women

In practice, futanari introduced under real biological laws would end up with small, medium, or even tiny penises — exactly how they were portrayed in older works before the modern reinterpretation of the 1980s/90s.

Some common medical problems would include:

Hyperestrogenism (excess estrogen)

Partial hyperandrogenism (irregular testosterone production)

Gonadal dysfunction (atrophied or nonfunctional ovaries/testes)

Ovotestis (mixed ovary/testis tissue, common in some intersex forms)

Hypergonadotropic hypogonadism (gonads unresponsive to hormones)

Chronic endocrine imbalance → constant hormonal irregularities

Insulin resistance (predisposition to type 2 diabetes)

Visceral obesity (abdominal fat concentration)

Dyslipidemia (abnormal cholesterol/triglycerides)

Metabolic syndrome (hypertension, obesity, insulin resistance, cardiovascular risk)

Erectile dysfunction (difficulty maintaining erections)

Anorgasmia (difficulty or inability to orgasm)

Low libido / hypoactive sexual desire (caused by hormonal dysregulation)

Chronic pelvic pain (malformed reproductive organs)

Early-onset osteopenia (bone density loss)

Osteoporosis (weak/brittle bones)

Sarcopenia (muscle mass loss)

General physical weakness

Incomplete secondary sexual development (small breasts, irregular body hair, unclear voice)

By contrast, most trans women would not suffer from such complications. Therefore, they are superior and would surpass futanari in strength or other aspects.

Topic: Can men have breasts?

Yes, men can naturally have large breasts, and this happens for several reasons:

1. Genetics/natural inheritance — Just as some women naturally have large breasts due to family traits, some men are also born with more breast tissue. It’s natural, without intervention.


2. Hormonal imbalances or hormones — Breast growth in men can occur when estrogen levels are higher or when hormonal changes happen. This may be natural, due to hormone use, or caused by medical conditions like gynecomastia.


3. Surgery or implants — Men can also enlarge their breasts through medical procedures such as silicone implants if they desire greater volume.

Wow, you actually replied haha. First of all, sorry for not responding right away — honestly, I didn’t think anyone would answer me. Now, let’s get to the real show: unfortunately, my original text explaining this myth — as if most intersex people actually had two organs (majority × exception) — was deleted. So, out of sheer laziness, I’ll just focus on what interested me the most.

You know, you must be the typical individual who whines whenever confronted with a fact. But out of pity, I’ll go genuinely easy on you...


---

1: Yes, on average, your biological sex does shape your preferences and, at times, behavioral patterns. There’s no shortage of studies on this.

2: I don’t know if this part was directed at me, but I’m not familiar with Bridget. All I know is that, in the main storyline, he was conceived as a boy, but because of a superstition that twins brought misfortune, he was raised as a girl. Otherwise, they would have had to kill him or give him up for adoption. Even so, he later rejected that identity.
And just to be clear: my point was never, absolutely never, about whether Bridget is trans or not.

3: It depends. If we’re talking about breast size, then yes — it can and probably does matter. There are some studies on this, but unfortunately, my notes (which contained dozens of peer-reviewed articles) were lost. (And yes, penis size definitely matters).

4: The issue with the LGBT community is that they tend to be overly sensitive. Not even Christians are that sensitive. So relax, young grasshopper — it’s not like I hate trans women. On the contrary, I actually find the concept beautiful and extremely fascinating. That’s why, in terms of hierarchy, I’d rank it like this:
trans women >> intersex >> futanari.

But who would win: futanari or cis women? Honestly, I believe that in most scenarios, cis women win. So, another version of the hierarchy would be:
cis women >>> futanari.
And in the worst-case scenario, it would look like:
trans women >> intersex >> futanari >> cis women.

In practice, futanari introduced under real biological laws would end up with small, medium, or even tiny penises — just as they were portrayed in older works, before the modern reinterpretation (1980s/90s).

Some of the common medical issues:

Hyperestrogenism (excess estrogen)

Partial hyperandrogenism (irregular testosterone production)

Gonadal dysfunction (atrophied or non-functional ovaries and/or testes)

Ovotestis (mixed ovary-testis tissue, common in some intersex forms)

Hypergonadotropic hypogonadism (gonads not responding properly to regulatory hormones)

Chronic endocrine imbalance → constant hormonal irregularity

Insulin resistance (predisposition to type 2 diabetes)

Visceral obesity (predominant abdominal fat)

Dyslipidemia (abnormal cholesterol and triglycerides)

Metabolic syndrome (hypertension, obesity, insulin resistance, cardiovascular risk)

Erectile dysfunction (difficulty maintaining erections)

Anorgasmia (difficulty or inability to orgasm)

Low libido / hypoactive sexual desire (caused by hormonal dysregulation)

Chronic pelvic pain (malformed reproductive organs causing pain)

Early-onset osteopenia (loss of bone density)

Osteoporosis (weak, brittle bones)

Sarcopenia (loss of muscle mass)

General physical weakness

Incomplete secondary sexual development (small breasts, irregular body hair, undefined voice)


Counterpoint: trans women, for the most part, wouldn’t suffer from such complications. Therefore, they are superior and would outperform futanari in fights or in other aspects.

5: My main problem here is with people of “negative IQ” who slap the futa tag onto content that clearly isn’t futa. Honestly, I wouldn’t mind if they also added the shemale/trans tag (which, at the end of the day, mean the same thing). But they don’t.
There’s even a character people were shocked to find out was trans, simply because she was always tagged as futa. I wasn’t surprised at all — since any character born with a full penis and external testicles is, by definition, trans/shemale. The only thing that genuinely surprised me was the author actually showing the beginning of that character’s transition. (No, I don’t remember her name, but she’s quite popular).

6: Since the majority of people who consume trans content are men (around 80% of viewers and 90% of paying customers, in my experience), the same applies to futanari. Men have always been — and still are — the main creators and consumers, especially on the consumption side.
The problem is that men often feel “less masculine” for consuming gay content. So they label anything with a feminine appearance (breasts + penis) as futa (short for futanari).
And here’s the catch: if everything is futa, then nothing is futa. In the end, they’re just masturbating to trans women/traps without even realizing it, deliberately trying to avoid labels. Yet they contradict themselves by tagging whatever suits them as futa, just to feel “less gay.”

7: Of course, there’s also the LGBTQ+ community controversy, since people accuse them of “stealing” the futa concept — as if they wanted trans women to be considered futanari too. But I have my own opinion about this ongoing confusion.
Since tags like transfem, trans, or trans woman aren’t very popular, some people unfortunately tag trans characters as futanari just to gain visibility (views). This is often perceived as an attempt to “steal” the concept. For context: the tag shemale is well-known on some sites, but others avoid labeling trans women with it because of the historical negativity and hate associated with the term.

Bonus: At the end of the day, anyone born with a penis and breasts (without a vagina) is biologically male, regardless of what you believe. For example: if an already-established female character (in an existing work) suddenly appears with a penis and no vagina, then the most accurate term would be dickgirl. This is simply a way to separate them from original characters (OCs).
However, if such a character is an OC and was born with a penis and breasts, then biologically and conceptually, she is trans/shemale.

and there were users who called me fucktard for minimum details like pronuntiation on an animation, but this guy "ART.man" is not just that, but probably less than nothing.

To make things short and clear: there's only two sexs, even on intersexual persons (even if they have both organs, their genetic balances them to a certain sex). And so what? Sex doesn't determine your likes and tendencies. If Bridget being a cute trans girl who actually did what appears an incredibly achieved, not harmful transition, it's canon, then so be it. Fans love her. So what? It's amazing. That there's men with bigger boobs than women? Then so be it, size doesn't matter but for men with micropenises, and it's even a benefit for those who don't have big boobs (cuz the back pain)

Stop writing fucking essays on bullshit and just enjoy the animation dammit. Even I am getting bored of writing these shitass explanations.

Why do people look for specific characters and genders that caters to them when watching porn animations I wonder? Is it because they have preferences?

who cares? Look around, dumbass nigga.

There is one truth that people often refuse to face: there are no women born with a fully developed penis. The human body simply does not allow for such a biological paradox. Chromosomal sex determination, embryonic development, and reproductive differentiation are not flexible in this way. If someone has a penis, then—genetically and biologically—they were not born female. There is no exception where a woman is naturally born with a complete, functioning penis.

But here is where reality becomes both fascinating and surreal: men, on the other hand, can develop breasts. And not just small, minimal growths. In some rare biological cases, they can develop large, fully-formed breasts that look indistinguishable from those of a woman. This can occur due to conditions such as gynecomastia, where hormonal imbalances cause breast tissue to grow significantly, sometimes to the point of resembling natural female breasts in both shape and size. In these rare cases, a man may carry on his chest what looks exactly like female anatomy, despite having a male reproductive system.

Beyond rare conditions, hormone therapy can also allow men to grow breasts. When testosterone is suppressed and estrogen levels are introduced, the body responds by stimulating breast tissue growth. With favorable genetics, this can result in a surprisingly natural appearance. And, of course, there is always the surgical option—implants—which provide the third pathway for male breasts to exist.

So here is the crucial distinction:

A “woman with a penis” is a cultural or pornographic invention—it does not exist in the realm of natural biology.

But a “man with breasts” is a biological reality—sometimes natural, sometimes medically induced, but absolutely real.


The development of a penis and the development of breasts are processes governed by completely different mechanisms. The penis, a primary reproductive organ, is determined early in embryonic development based on chromosomal and hormonal signaling. Breasts, on the other hand, are secondary sexual characteristics, and they are far more influenced by hormonal fluctuations throughout life. That is why men can, under the right circumstances, grow them—while women cannot, under any circumstance, be born with a complete, functioning penis.

This asymmetry in biology is both clear and astonishing. It reveals how easily culture, pornography, and online debates distort scientific reality. What is impossible for the female body is entirely possible for the male body. That is not opinion—it is nature, laid bare in its strange, surreal logic.

And so, when people confuse these concepts—when they insist on calling “women with penises” a natural category—they are not just being imprecise; they are rejecting the very fundamentals of human biology. What actually exists is much stranger, and much more real: men with breasts, formed through nature, hormones, or surgery. A surreal truth that demonstrates how flexible, yet firmly divided, human sexual development really is.

No, the tag should not be “Futa Bridget.” Futa is only an abbreviation of futanari, and both terms carry a very simple concept: having both reproductive organs simultaneously.

In fact, there are only three ways for someone assigned male at birth to have breasts:

1. Biological conditions such as gynecomastia, which in rare cases can cause the development of fully developed, large breasts that closely resemble female breasts—not just small growth [NIH – National Library of Medicine].


2. Hormone therapy, especially when combined with favorable genetics.


3. Breast implants (silicone).



And here’s the key point: if a character hasn’t used magic to remove the vagina, hasn’t undergone surgery to remove the vagina, or hasn’t substituted the penis for a vagina, then that character is by definition trans/shemale, not futa.

This is not just a matter of opinion. By definition, futanari (二成り) in Japanese refers to characters who possess both male and female sexual characteristics at the same time, rooted in the concept of hermaphroditism. Multiple Japanese sources, including cultural and linguistic studies, confirm that futanari involves simultaneous possession of penis and vagina—not simply one being replaced by the other [[Kinsella, Adult Manga: Culture and Power in Contemporary Japanese Society, 2000]; [Galbraith, Otaku and the Struggle for Imagination in Japan, 2019]].

So mislabeling a character like Bridget as “futa” is not only incorrect—it also distorts Japanese cultural terminology.

(It was about another video, but it also works) Look at how Western pornography is frying people’s brains. Some idiots are calling the character V from Cyberpunk 2077 a “futa,” which is just an abbreviation of futanari. But there’s one huge problem: futa/futanari comes from the concept of Eastern hermaphroditism, which existed long before any hentai was created. And the definition is very straightforward: having both reproductive organs.

So why is it so difficult to understand that if a female character doesn’t use magic to grow a penis, doesn’t undergo surgery to remove the vagina, or doesn’t eliminate one organ in favor of the other, then that character should automatically be classified as trans/shemale? It’s such a simple concept.

I understand when someone uses the “futa” tag just to gain visibility—since, unfortunately, the “trans” tag isn’t as popular yet. But when someone calls a character who clearly has all the traits of a trans/shemale “futa,” it’s just absurd. Especially in the case of V from Cyberpunk 2077, who literally only has three genital model options: 1) male, 2) female, and 3) neutral. There is no option for simultaneous organs, which would actually fall under the hermaphrodite/futanari category.

We’ve spent so much time labeling everything as futanari that now everything has become futa—even official characters are being misclassified as futa. That’s a complete disregard for Japanese culture (and yes, Japanese people openly say the West is ignorant for constantly misusing the term).

And one last thing: individuals who were assigned male at birth can naturally develop breasts. There are three ways this can happen:

1. Rare biological conditions (such as gynecomastia, which in some cases can result in unusually large breast growth).


2. Hormone use, combined with favorable genetics.


3. Surgical implants (silicone).

why does gender matter when its a porn animation... who cares anyways tbf its a fictional character

"Bridget is canonically a transgirl" Wrong. What a fucking death of an actually well written character for the false rainbow freaks. Play the fucking games and learn about him, get out of your echochambers you trogs. Great reminder to gatekeep the things you love.
As inaccurate the animation is like I've said before bussin'. One of the best of Bridget even.

Was gonna question the futa tag until I saw that Bridget has tits.

The rest of you can cry about, Bridget is canonically a transgirl.

Fruit salad, yummy yummy

@SIMΩMEGA lol Ted reference

pmo tags

Fantastic, great work! Bridget was part of my queer awakening years back, I'll always have a soft spot for her.

ts is js vile, der r no chicks wiv dicks, only dudes wiv tits ????

@femboyfuckboy ye & she also got canonically got grumed by her parents so wt, her being trans doesnt mk sense wiv her origin story in de 1° guilty gears, its woke, its bad lgbt rep objectively.
@chumbawumba
@Dbd22 ikr
@NoHonor no, dat wld b ur moder ????; also de tags r
@Lwue in de video yes but still wrong tag, vid shld b renamed 2 "futa bridget" & der wld b no problems, & a tag lik futafied or sm shi lk dat idk
@Infiny ikr, based ????

Who tf tagged dis as futa bruh ????????????

God dammit can I join? I'll fuck Bridget hehehe. He's living the femboy life i wanna live >_

???????????? BRIDGET IS A MAN. ????????????

I knew there was going to be chaos in the comments again once the full animation came out

PSA:
if youre smellin something fowl rn its prolly the lards who've never played guilty gear complaining about bridgets gender in the comments

This is greatt thr best of all time

Bridget is literally canonically trans Infiny you wet wipe

Bro this shit is why I hate strive why tf does Bridget have tits he's a femboy not trans

why is one of the tags 2 girls? Baiken is female, but Bridget is male.

Is Bridget like your god or something, Infiny?

Bridget actually has boobs so I think they might by futa for this

Cringe dumbfucks. Futanari and femboys are not trans. Keep that real world political shit out!

Superb!!!

bussin