This website contains age-restricted materials including nudity and explicit depictions of sexual activity. By entering, you affirm that you are at least 18 years of age or the age of majority in the jurisdiction you are accessing the website from and you consent to viewing sexually explicit content.
So, about furries, zoophilia, carnivorism and other details.
Essentially, furries are nothing but anthro animals, which means they have traits from us humans while keeping some characteristics from their real selves, being these traits something that depends on the author how it'll work. For example, Zootopia animals, despite being bipedal, many of them still have highly noticeable animal traits such as slowness (like sloths and turtles) or hooves instead of hands and feet (horses and gazelles). Obviously, there's not a high amount of anthro on those aspects,which we could say are not very important, but if we straight up look at stories like Beastars, the thing gets complicated, cuz the anthro it's entirely in terms of mammals except for their sizes, strength, and obviously with some exception such as snakes, but most importantly the diet. Now, as I said that depends on the author's vision, and Eipril has always been an artist that had a more "humanistic" touch within their furries, making them not only incredibly human like (as we can see, a bull and a deer having hands instead of hooves) but as I said, human. Specially, let's remember the important details that us humans are no different from animals, we actually are descendants of apes who have gained enough sentience and potential to start working on concepts that are way hard for normal animals to get. So yeah, that would explain why them furries can eat meat normally, cuz they're that, humans, but more exactly a bovine and a cervidae instead of homo.
Now, about zoophilia... making clear, it's bad irl. It can partially be forgiven as media, as long as it isn't glorified. Our spectrum remarks the importance of consent, and that's something most animals can't give.
Conclusion: Furries technically are still humans, not neccesarily zoophiles, and zoophiles and the whole zoophilia spectrum it's bad. That's what I argument. Sorry for the loads o text just to explain what the meatballs would be made of lol.
also, I was not expecting the deer girl to be the boss. Like, she being cute already made my night, but that detail straight up made it far than that. Today, I smile :3
Essentially, furries are nothing but anthro animals, which means they have traits from us humans while keeping some characteristics from their real selves, being these traits something that depends on the author how it'll work. For example, Zootopia animals, despite being bipedal, many of them still have highly noticeable animal traits such as slowness (like sloths and turtles) or hooves instead of hands and feet (horses and gazelles). Obviously, there's not a high amount of anthro on those aspects,which we could say are not very important, but if we straight up look at stories like Beastars, the thing gets complicated, cuz the anthro it's entirely in terms of mammals except for their sizes, strength, and obviously with some exception such as snakes, but most importantly the diet. Now, as I said that depends on the author's vision, and Eipril has always been an artist that had a more "humanistic" touch within their furries, making them not only incredibly human like (as we can see, a bull and a deer having hands instead of hooves) but as I said, human. Specially, let's remember the important details that us humans are no different from animals, we actually are descendants of apes who have gained enough sentience and potential to start working on concepts that are way hard for normal animals to get. So yeah, that would explain why them furries can eat meat normally, cuz they're that, humans, but more exactly a bovine and a cervidae instead of homo.
Now, about zoophilia... making clear, it's bad irl. It can partially be forgiven as media, as long as it isn't glorified. Our spectrum remarks the importance of consent, and that's something most animals can't give.
Conclusion: Furries technically are still humans, not neccesarily zoophiles, and zoophiles and the whole zoophilia spectrum it's bad. That's what I argument. Sorry for the loads o text just to explain what the meatballs would be made of lol.